compare movie the trial of the chicago 7 and The People vs. Larry Flynt‎ (1996) in detail

The Trial of the Chicago 7 and The People vs. Larry Flynt are two movies that share a common theme of free speech and the right to protest. Both movies are based on real-life events and court cases, but have different approaches in terms of storytelling, characters, and tone.

The Trial of the Chicago 7 is directed by Aaron Sorkin and follows the trial of seven anti-war activists who were arrested and charged with conspiracy and inciting riots during the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The movie portrays the political and social tensions of the time, as well as the corruption and bias within the justice system. The characters are well-developed, with each representing a different perspective on the protest movement and the trial. The tone is serious and intense, with occasional moments of humor and wit.

The People vs. Larry Flynt is directed by Milos Forman and is based on the court case of Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt, who was sued by evangelist Jerry Falwell for libel and emotional distress. The movie explores the controversial and provocative nature of Flynt's magazine, as well as his personal life and struggles. The characters are also well-developed, with Flynt portrayed as a complex and flawed individual who fights for his First Amendment rights. The tone is more satirical and irreverent, with a mix of drama, comedy, and social commentary.

One major difference between the two movies is their approach to the legal system. The Trial of the Chicago 7 is critical of the justice system and portrays the trial as a political show trial, with the judge and prosecutors biased against the defendants. The People vs. Larry Flynt, on the other hand, is more sympathetic to the legal system and portrays the court case as a battle between two opposing views on free speech.

Another difference is their treatment of the main characters. In The Trial of the Chicago 7, the characters are portrayed as heroic and noble, fighting for justice and the right to protest. In The People vs. Larry Flynt, the characters are more flawed and controversial, with Flynt's behavior and magazine content often criticized by others. However, both movies show the characters as passionate and determined to defend their beliefs, even in the face of adversity.

Overall, both movies are thought-provoking and engaging, with different styles and perspectives on free speech and the legal system. While The Trial of the Chicago 7 is more serious and focused on the political and social issues of its time, The People vs. Larry Flynt is more satirical and personal, exploring the life and struggles of a controversial figure. Both movies are worth watching for anyone interested in the history and importance of free speech and the right to protest.