Enhancing Objectivity in Consultant Pre-selection: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model

Enhancing Objectivity in Consultant Pre-selection: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model

This abstract analyzes the chapter structure elements concerning a study on improving the objectivity of consultant pre-selection.

Background Introduction: The abstract highlights the significance of consultant pre-selection and acknowledges potential inconsistencies in pre-selection decisions due to varying client criteria and priorities.

Objective: The study aims to establish a more objective framework for evaluating the general capabilities of consultants during the pre-selection phase.

Method: A questionnaire survey was conducted among clients tasked with pre-selecting consultants and the consultants themselves. This aimed to examine the perceived importance of pre-selection criteria (CPC).

Results: The findings reveal a strong consensus between clients and consulting groups regarding the significance of CPC.

Proposed Model: A multi-criteria model is proposed for evaluating the general capabilities of consultants during pre-selection.

Conclusion: The model allows clients to determine which engineering consultants should be invited to bid for a consultancy assignment based on individual candidate scores.

This abstract emphasizes addressing the objectivity issue in consultant pre-selection. By conducting a questionnaire survey and proposing a multi-criteria model, the study aims to assist clients in accurately assessing consultants' capabilities and selecting the most suitable candidates.