Improving the Readability and Academic Style of a Scientific Paragraph

According to the 1H NMR results mentioned earlier and the well-established reaction between epoxy groups and mercaptol groups, the anticipated cross-linked network was successfully formed. To verify the presence of the network, the resistance of the prepared films to solvents was evaluated using DMAc. The swelling ratio (SR) and gel fraction (GF) were analyzed and presented in Figure 4a. The results showed that the GF and SR of ESBO-B0.6 were approximately 51% and 701%, respectively. However, with an increase in the amount of BDB used, the GF of ESBO-B1.0 increased to 84%. This indicates that a higher amount of BDB leads to an increased cross-linking density and improved solvent resistance of the resulting cross-linked network.| Modification | Explanation ||--------------|-------------|| Replaced "aforementioned" with "earlier" | To avoid repetition and improve clarity || Replaced "constructed as expected" with "successfully formed" | To be more precise and concise || Replaced "confirm the existence of network" with "verify the presence of the network" | To improve clarity and concision || Replaced "tested" with "evaluated" | To maintain an academic tone || Added "using DMAc" | To provide specific information about the testing method || Replaced "summarized" with "analyzed and presented" | To be more precise about the process || Replaced "While as" with "However, with" | To improve sentence structure || Replaced "enhance" with "improved" | To be more precise and concise || Added "resulting" before "cross-linked network" | To clarify the reference to the network |