Addressing Concerns Regarding Backbone Comparison in Research Methods

Thank you for taking the time to express your gratitude to the authors for their feedback. It is important to acknowledge the value of constructive criticism in academic discourse, especially when it comes to improving the quality of research.

In regards to your concerns about the comparison of methods with different backbones, it is indeed a valid point to consider. When comparing different methods, it is crucial to ensure that they are evaluated under fair and consistent conditions. The use of different backbones may introduce confounding variables that could affect the validity of the results.

It is recommended to consider alternative approaches, such as using the same backbone for all methods or conducting a separate evaluation for each backbone. This would provide a more robust and reliable comparison of the methods under study.

Overall, your feedback is important in promoting critical evaluation and improving the quality of research. It is essential to consider different perspectives and address potential limitations to ensure the validity and reliability of scientific findings.