Doping Methods: A Comparative Analysis and Their Impact on Site Structure

In the section on doping implementation, after careful consideration, we believe that the doping method should be the basis for classification, as the current reported work on controlling the preparation of specific doping sites is still not well developed, and similar methods may also result in different site structures. Summarizing according to the differences in preparation methods may be more practically valuable. Therefore, after reorganizing, the doping method is divided into three sections: direct mixing thermal decomposition, post-adsorption thermal decomposition, and vapor-phase deposition, as sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 of chapter two. A brief description of the characteristics of each preparation method is provided before each section, with a focus on how dopants enter the material. Selected examples are added and rewritten based on the current version's emphasis, and some preparation illustrations are added to aid in explanation.

Regarding the issue of not presenting their own opinions, we summarized and summarized the contents of the rearranged article. A brief summary and summary of the main content of this chapter are provided at the beginning of chapter one (page 5) and at the end of chapter two (page 26), and some personal opinions are presented. In addition, we refined the language of the conclusion section, removing conclusions that were not introduced in the main text, significantly simplifying our conclusions. Zhao's work is excellent, and compared to Zhao's work, our work focuses more on the impact of doping on site points and doping strategies. We agree that more methods for designing controllable site points are needed, and on this basis, we believe that further research into the changes in material structure and composition during the preparation process may be the key to further breakthroughs.