Critical Discourse Analysis of 'Lying Flat' in Chinese State Media

Identify the Discourse: The first step in conducting a critical discourse analysis about 'lying flat' through Chinese state media is to identify the discourse. This means identifying the dominant ideas, themes, and messages being conveyed through the media. In this case, the discourse is about the 'lying flat' movement, a social phenomenon in China where young people reject traditional values of hard work and success, choosing a simpler, minimalist lifestyle.

Analyze the Language: The next step involves analyzing the language used in the discourse. This examines the words, phrases, and metaphors used to convey ideas and messages. For example, the Chinese state media might use language portraying the 'lying flat' movement as a threat to social stability or a sign of moral decay among young people.

Examine the Power Dynamics: Critical discourse analysis also examines the power dynamics present in the discourse. This means looking at who has the power to shape and control the discourse and how this power influences public opinion. In the case of 'lying flat,' the Chinese state media has significant power to shape the discourse, often using it to promote the government's agenda and maintain social stability.

Consider the Historical Context: Another important aspect of conducting a critical discourse analysis is considering the historical context. This means examining how the discourse has evolved over time and how it is influenced by broader social, economic, and political factors. In the case of 'lying flat,' the discourse is influenced by China's rapid economic growth and the changing social values that come with it.

Look for Contradictions and Silences: Finally, critical discourse analysis involves looking for contradictions and silences in the discourse. This means examining what is being said and what is not being said, and looking for inconsistencies or contradictions in the messages being conveyed. For example, the Chinese state media might promote the 'lying flat' movement as a threat to social stability while ignoring the underlying economic and social factors driving the movement.