Translation of Text Regarding Laser Processing and Superhydrophobicity

Thank you for your kind suggestions. (1) Not all surface samples prepared with the combination of laser processing parameters are superhydrophobic, and some superhydrophobic samples may have excessive processing. Therefore, we believe it is not necessary to provide a top view of each etched surface, but only a top view of a typical laser texture surface (including recognizable micro and nano structures). (2) We added standard deviations for each measurement value in Table 2, and distinguished between hydrophobic and superhydrophobic at a threshold of 150°. (3) We believe that the chemical analysis in Figure 7 is only used to qualitatively compare the element content changes of superhydrophobic surfaces before and after water droplet cleaning, demonstrating that the element content of the sample surface after cleaning with artificial carbon black is basically consistent with the level before artificial carbon black deposition, so there is no need for more accurate quantitative analysis. (4) We added a definition of self-cleaning efficiency: the percentage of the mass of deposited carbon removed by cleaning compared to the mass of deposited carbon on the sample surface.