Fuel Tank Impact on Cargo: Analysis of ROB Documents and Cargo Condition

As stated in the email, we understand that the opposing party's request for the ROB documents is to aid in determining the effect of the fuel tank on the cargo, as the fuel tank must be kept warm during use or refueling.

Upon reviewing the GA, we have observed that the top side tanks of cargo hold No. 6&7 are the fuel tank No. 1 FOT P&S and No. 2 FOT P&S, and there are no fuel tanks located around other cargo holds.

Based on the attached ROB records, it is inferred that the fuel in No. 1 FOT P&S was consumed during the voyage, and both No. 1 FOT P&S and No. 2 FOT P&S were refilled in Singapore during this voyage. We acknowledge that the opposing party may request temperature records of the fuel tanks or even suggest that the cargo was affected.

However, it is important to note that the receiver has not raised any concerns regarding the quality of the cargo in the top side of cargo holds No. 6&7 (near the fuel tanks) being worse than the bottom or other cargo holds. In fact, the receiver only claimed that the cargo in cargo hold No. 4 was worse than others. Additionally, our on-site inspection only revealed abnormal discoloration in cargo holds No. 2, 4, and 5. Furthermore, the recorded temperature of the fuel tanks in the attached ROB documents is still lower than the temperature of the cargo. Therefore, we believe it is challenging to establish a causal relationship between the alleged cargo damage and the fuel tank.

Unless there are specific regulations on the use and warming of the fuel tank in the voyage instructions or charter party, we have not found any adverse factors for the shipowner in providing the attached documents to the opposing party.