The SPRO company claims that the assessment results cannot cover its actual expenditure costs and certain items such as PPE and generators were not includedreported during the site working so the

The SPRO company argues that the assessment results are inadequate in capturing its actual expenditure costs due to the omission of certain items, including PPE and generators, during the site working. Consequently, they are unable to accept the results. Additionally, the company attributes its high expenditure costs to the pre-pandemic rate, which fails to account for significant increases in prices and labor costs, particularly during the pandemic. As a result, items such as ships and oil booms cannot be covered by the existing cost structure. The SPRO company asserts that they will furnish additional evidence in the future to substantiate their claims.