价值理性和工具理性的区分理性起了什么作用：西方是分方向和决定性的两种 中国也分为两种朱熹：知道如何就培养如何认识指导你的实践康德和程朱理学的共同点第二个意志决定理性并不是决定的。决定的是自身的意志。理性只是起的例如亚当斯密、卢梭、西方的休谟人的欲望才是决定的一切的。跟儒家相似、陆王心学相似我想以中西方哲学对于理性方面对比的5000字论文请为其列提纲

I. Introduction

• Brief overview of the concept of rationality in Western and Chinese philosophy
• Thesis statement: a comparison of the distinction between value rationality and instrumental rationality in Western philosophy and the two types of rationality in Chinese philosophy

II. Value rationality and instrumental rationality in Western philosophy

• Definition and characteristics of value rationality
• Definition and characteristics of instrumental rationality
• Examples of philosophers who emphasized one type of rationality over the other (e.g. Weber, Hume, Smith)

III. Two types of rationality in Chinese philosophy

• Overview of the two types of rationality according to Zhu Xi
• Comparison to the distinction between value and instrumental rationality in Western philosophy
• Commonalities with Kant and Neo-Confucianism

IV. The role of will in rational decision-making

• Argument that will, not reason, ultimately determines action in Western philosophy (e.g. Rousseau, Hume)
• Comparison to the emphasis on will in Chinese philosophy (e.g. Confucianism, Neo-Confucianism)

V. Critiques and challenges to rationality

• Critiques of rationality in Western philosophy (e.g. postmodernism, existentialism)
• Critiques of rationality in Chinese philosophy (e.g. Daoism, Chan Buddhism)
• Comparison of the critiques and their implications for the role of rationality in philosophy

VI. Conclusion

• Recap of the main points and arguments presented in the paper
• Discussion of the significance of the comparison between Western and Chinese philosophy on the concept of rationality
• Suggestions for future research on the topi