Hazard with Warning Level 10: This can potentially affect customer safety and/or involve non-compliance with government regulations, or may cause harm to operators (of machinery or assembly lines) even with warning signs.

Hazard with Warning Level 9: The product loses basic functionality, severely disrupting the production line. 100% of the products may need to be scrapped, or the repair time exceeds 1 hour.

Hazard with Warning Level 8: The product can still be used but its performance level decreases. Customers are highly dissatisfied. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and some (less than 100%) of the products need to be scrapped or repaired within a time frame of 0.5-1 hour.

Hazard with Warning Level 7: The product can still be used, but there are non-functional defects in appearance that cause customer dissatisfaction. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and some (less than 100%) of the products may need to be scrapped, but no selection is required. The repair time for the products is less than 0.5 hours.

Hazard with Warning Level 6: The product can still be used, but there are minor non-functional defects in appearance. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and 100% of the products may need rework.

Hazard with Warning Level 5: Customers experience slight inconvenience, and most (over 75%) of the customers can detect the defects. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and the products may need to be selected, without the need for scrapping. However, some (less than 100%) of the products require rework.

Hazard with Warning Level 4: Customers experience slight inconvenience, and 50% of the customers can detect the defects. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and some (less than 100%) of the products may require rework, without the need for scrapping. The repair does not occupy a production line workstation.

Hazard with Warning Level 3: Customers experience slight inconvenience, and only a small percentage (less than 25%) of the customers can detect the defects. There is a slight disruption to the production line, and some (less than 100%) of the products may require rework, without scrapping. The repair does not occupy a production line workstation.

Hazard with Warning Level 2: There are no identifiable impacts. There is slight inconvenience or no impact on operations or operators.

Hazard with Warning Level 1: Failure is not likely to occur.

Risk Assessment Criteria for Failure Mode Occurrence (O):

Very High: Persistent failure ≥100 out of 1000 pieces High: Frequent failure 20 out of 1000 pieces Medium: Random failure 5 out of 1000 pieces Low: Relatively rare failure 0.5 out of 1000 pieces Lowest: Failure is unlikely to occur ≤0.01 out of 1000 pieces

Risk Assessment Criteria for Detectability (D):

Almost Impossible: Absolutely impossible to detect or check Very Small: Control methods may not be able to detect Small: Control has very few chances to detect Medium: Control may be able to detect Medium-High: Control has more chances to detect High: Control almost certainly can detect Very High: Control can definitely detect

Product Name: Design Responsibility Department: Department Personnel: Phone: FMEA Number: QR7.3-09 FMEA Date (Compilation): First compilation date Project Name: Key Dates: Revision Date (main final completion date must not be later than mass production): Prepared by: FMEA Date (Revision): Revised date Further Revision:

Product Functional Requirements: Potential Failure Mode: Potential Failure Consequences: Severity (S) Level: Potential Failure Cause/Mechanism: Occurrence (O): Current Design Preventive Controls: Current Design Controls: Detectability (D): Risk Priority Number (RPN): Suggested Measures: Responsibility and Target Completion Date: Measure Results: Measures Taken: Severity: Occurrence: Detectability: RPN: Measurability: Frequency of Occurrence: Experimental Standards, Design Guidelines, Deformation Design Review, Design Verification (Prototype Parts); Road Test. Difficulty level remains generally unchanged; Testing method: flexible rotation, not flexible, customer dissatisfaction, gap size: 7.

DFMEA (Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) Report (Attachment 7).

PFMEA (Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) Report (Attachment 8).

Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) for the Process

你是公司的一名译者请你使用准确的英语完整翻译以下内容并按照原文格式排版。10 有警告的危害 潜在的失效模式在有警告的情况下影响顾客安全和或涉及不符合政府法规的情形时 或可能在有警告的情况下对机器或装配线操作者造成危害 9 很高 产品丧失基本功能 严重干扰生产线100的产品可能需要报废或返修时间在1小时以上 8 高 产品可使用但性能水平下降。 顾客非常不满意。 轻微干扰生产线产品需要进行挑选、一部分

原文地址: https://www.cveoy.top/t/topic/hYOJ 著作权归作者所有。请勿转载和采集!

免费AI点我,无需注册和登录