Dear Tim,

I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to update you on your concern regarding the laboratory testing. After checking with the laboratory, I have some information that may be helpful to you.

Firstly, the test standard and method of CAN/ULC S102 is similar to that of the ASTM E84 fire rated test. However, this test does not indicate whether the materials are suitable for specific scenarios. I have attached the test report for your reference.

Secondly, the test summary of CAN/ULC S102 only shows "floor" and "other structure" as it is a standard format. However, I have spoken to the operator and they have provided a solution. We can add something like "Wall covering PET acoustic panel or ceiling PET acoustic panel" into the sample's name to indicate the orientation of the sample. However, this information will not be shown in the test summary. If you still wish to proceed with this test, we can perform it again with the modified sample names. Please let me know your thoughts on this.

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you soon

better way to express below textGood afternoon Timregard to your concern we have been checked with the laboratory 1 The test standard&method of CANULC S102 is basically the same with ASTM E84 fire rat

原文地址: https://www.cveoy.top/t/topic/fWHe 著作权归作者所有。请勿转载和采集!

免费AI点我,无需注册和登录