This study challenges the traditional classification of AI expenditures. It posits that these expenditures should be considered investments in capital assets. Unlike traditional tangible assets, AI systems generate long-term service flows that directly enhance production capabilities. Therefore, evaluating AI expenditures based on criteria designed for long-term tangible asset spending is not appropriate. This research highlights the need for a new framework that recognizes the unique nature of AI investments and their impact on long-term productivity.

Rethinking AI Expenditures: Investments in Capital Assets, Not Traditional Tangible Assets

原文地址: https://www.cveoy.top/t/topic/fUYU 著作权归作者所有。请勿转载和采集!

免费AI点我,无需注册和登录