Cargo Damage Risk: Temperature Fluctuations and Fuel Tank Proximity

The captain of a cargo ship acknowledged receiving no specific cargo storage instructions from the charterer or shipper for a particular voyage. Based on experience, the captain determined ventilation unnecessary for transporting goods from a cold to a warm region. However, temperature records revealed an initial decrease followed by an increase in external temperature, potentially raising concerns from cargo interests.

Cargo interests frequently express concerns about the presence of fuel tanks due to their typically higher temperatures compared to the surrounding environment. This elevated temperature can create conditions conducive to mold growth. However, in this specific case, only two wing tanks in hold 5 were designated as fuel tanks, with none located near hold 2. Furthermore, temperature data from the fuel tanks near hold 5 demonstrated they were not heated, maintaining a consistent temperature range of 17-29 degrees Celsius throughout the voyage.

This case highlights the challenges faced in maritime transport, where decisions based on experience must be balanced with potential risks. While the captain acted on his best judgment regarding ventilation, the fluctuating temperatures could lead to cargo damage claims. The absence of fuel tanks near the cargo in hold 2 and the controlled temperature of the fuel tanks in hold 5 suggest a lower risk of mold growth in this particular instance.

To mitigate future risks and disputes, clear communication and documented instructions between all parties involved in the shipping process are crucial. This includes specific cargo storage requirements, temperature monitoring protocols, and ventilation guidelines. Proactive measures like these can protect cargo integrity and ensure a smooth shipping experience for all stakeholders.