请翻译1 新文件中的发现从 damaged list for containers issued by COSTAO for vessel DAPHNE VOY No 2085W 我们注意到用于装运题述货物的8个集装箱并未包含在内。这说明该8个集装箱在天津港卸箱时应该没有明显损坏。从Container photos and repair estimate 我们注意到除了集装箱TCNU3089173

Discoveries in the new file From the damaged list for containers issued by COSTAO for vessel DAPHNE VOY No. 2085W, we noticed that the 8 containers used to transport the mentioned goods were not included. This indicates that these 8 containers were not significantly damaged during unloading at Tianjin Port. From the container photos and repair estimate, we noticed that, except for container TCNU3089173, the other containers only require routine washing after being returned empty (container TEMU7474630 requires chemical cleaning), and no defects were found in the photos. For container TCNU3089173, we found a significant dent near the front left corner of the container number, and it is unknown whether it is damaged. A suspected black liquid trace was found in the upper right corner of the rear door (it is unknown whether there was a leak), please refer to the following photos for details. In summary, except for container TCNU3089173, the other containers are intact. Container TCNU3089173 may have suffered slight scratches or collisions during transfer at the port or after being picked up by the consignee. Of course, it is also possible that it was not included in the damaged list for containers due to slight deformation during unloading.

Reasons for moisture in cargo packaging Currently, based on the information we have, except for the warehouse keeper claiming that the cargo was moistened in the container, there is no substantive evidence, such as photos, to prove that the cargo damage is related to transportation. The warehouse keeper claimed that the moisture was discovered when opening the 8 containers, and no damage was found during transport. Based on the condition of the goods seen on site, we do not rule out the possibility that the goods were already moist before being packed, or that water entered from the bottom during transportation and port storage.

Counterparty claim Currently, the counterparty has not provided any evidence to support their claim. Based on our on-site inspection, we only found packaging deformation and rust on some stainless steel tubings of the bed's backrest. We believe the actual loss should be around USD 4,000. If the counterparty insists on claiming USD 253,664.49 from us, they should provide relevant evidence to prove that they suffered such a loss, and that the loss was caused by our responsibility. We will further evaluate based on their evidence and the actual inspection situation