The article discusses the issue of judicial review in the context of the effects-based, more economic approach. The Court of Justice has developed a process-oriented review paradigm, which focuses on procedural errors instead of substantive assessments. The scope of this review has been magnified by the demand to consider all relevant circumstances, which creates tensions between procedural and evidential standards. Defining relevance and dealing with incompleteness are important issues that require further reflection. The focus on finding errors may lead to a tunnel vision and a reluctance to reassess the case and evidence. The Commission must prove its case based on the arguments and evidence in the decision, while the applicant can provide new evidence during court proceedings. The Court must examine if the uncontested points and evidence in the decision can still sustain the substantive finding in question.

Summarize the following paragraphs 11 Judicial Review in the Era of ‘Effects-Based’ ‘More Economic’ Approach Examining how ‘cumbersome’ the effects-based more economic approach is would not be complet

原文地址: https://www.cveoy.top/t/topic/bwVJ 著作权归作者所有。请勿转载和采集!

免费AI点我,无需注册和登录