将下列段落准确翻译为英文：近年来夫妻间一方对外债务视为夫妻间个人债务的情况逐渐增多有时夫妻双方对外债务由法院依法裁定属于夫妻个人债务。在部分裁判文书中只有举债方需要承担责任而在执行过程中以一方当事人为被执行人的案例也不断增加。然而我国法定夫妻共有财产所有制却使夫妻双方个人财产受到极大限制所以在此类案件的执行中大部分被执行人的个人财产都不能满足个人债务的需求。从执行程序来看被执行人即为举债方但被执行

In recent years, the situation where one spouse treats external debts as personal debts between spouses has gradually increased. Sometimes, the external debts of both spouses are legally determined by the court to be personal debts of the couple. In some court rulings, only the borrowing party is held responsible, but cases where one party is the subject of enforcement action are also increasing. However, the legal system of spousal joint ownership of property in China severely limits the personal property of both spouses. Therefore, in the execution of such cases, the personal property of most defendants cannot meet the needs of personal debts. From the perspective of enforcement procedures, the borrower is the party subject to enforcement, but when the personal property of the defendant cannot satisfy the debt, the enforcement agency is more inclined to implement compulsory enforcement measures on the joint property of the defendant and their spouse, making joint property the subject of enforcement. At the same time, there are also certain deficiencies in the handling of spousal debt, which leads to different ways of handling such cases. Therefore, this study intends to select enforcement documents related to personal debts between spouses on the China Judgments Online website as the research object, analyze the wide geographical scope, long duration, concentrated causes, and review of objections and applications for review in practice. At the same time, the characteristics of the enforcement of personal debts between spouses in practice are summarized: the enforcement model of spousal personal debt varies from court to court, and there are many objections to enforcement and applications for review by outsiders. The rate of property division lawsuits in the execution of spousal personal debt is not high, and there is high controversy over the disposal of jointly owned houses. A series of problems in judicial practice are summarized: firstly, the unclear spousal personal debt execution system, secondly, the cumbersome litigation procedures resulting in low enforcement efficiency, thirdly, the conflict between the legal provisions of property division lawsuits and the division of jointly owned property, fourthly, the determination of the property share of jointly owned property by the enforcement agency without going through a judicial process. The reasons for these phenomena are analyzed: first, the lack of spousal personal debt repayment rules, second, the conflict between the value of the enforcement procedure and substantive rights, and third, the conflict between the value of the enforcement procedure and substantive rights. Countermeasures for the above problems are proposed: first, strengthen the guidance of principles, second, improve the property division lawsuit system, third, the enforcement agency should actively investigate property ownership, fourth, give the spouse the right to exclude enforcement, and fifth, establish a hearing procedure to clarify relief measures.