Addressing Reviewer Comments: Enhancing Manuscript Clarity and Comprehensibility

We sincerely appreciate the valuable feedback provided by the reviewer on our manuscript. Their insightful comments have significantly contributed to the improvement of our work. We have carefully considered each comment and made the necessary revisions accordingly.

Firstly, in response to the reviewer's suggestion of placing Figure 1 before the Methodology section, we agree that this adjustment would enhance the flow and comprehensibility of the paper. Therefore, we have repositioned Figure 1 accordingly, ensuring a more logical and coherent structure.

Secondly, we appreciate the remark regarding the need for more detailed explanations of Figure 4. We have revised the manuscript by providing additional descriptions and annotations to improve the understanding of this figure. We believe that these additions will contribute to a more comprehensive interpretation of the figure and its implications.

Furthermore, we acknowledge the reviewer's comment regarding the clear description of the training and testing stages in Section III. We have revised this section to provide a detailed explanation of both stages, incorporating step-by-step descriptions and mentioning all the parameters used. These revisions aim to enhance the readers' understanding and facilitate reproducibility of our experiments.

Lastly, we are grateful for the comment highlighting the need for proofreading and clarification of certain equation parameters. We have conducted thorough proofreading to ensure clarity and have revised the equations to provide explicit explanations of the parameters used.

We genuinely appreciate the reviewer's time and effort in providing such constructive feedback. It has significantly contributed to the overall quality of our manuscript, and we are confident that the revisions made address the reviewer's concerns effectively.