Should we use animals for experimentation purpose or forbid using animals for scientific experiment This has been an intensely discussed question in recent years The following are the supporters and o

The debate on whether animals should be used for scientific experimentation or not is a controversial issue that has been discussed for years. Supporters argue that animal experimentation is necessary for scientific advancement and medical research. They believe that animals have similar biological and physiological systems to humans, making them ideal for testing drugs, vaccines, and medical procedures. They also argue that animal experimentation has led to significant breakthroughs in medicine and public health, such as polio vaccine and insulin.

On the other hand, opponents argue that animal experimentation is unethical and cruel. They believe that animals have their rights and should not be subjected to any forms of pain and suffering. They also argue that the results from animal experimentation are not always applicable to humans due to the biological and physiological differences between animals and humans. Additionally, they argue that alternative methods, such as computer modeling and in vitro testing, can provide more accurate results without harming animals.

In my opinion, animal experimentation should be regulated and minimized as much as possible. While animal experimentation has contributed to significant medical breakthroughs, it should only be used when there are no other alternatives available. We should also ensure that animals are treated humanely and ethically, and their suffering is minimized. Additionally, we should invest in alternative methods that can provide accurate results without harming animals. Ultimately, the well-being of both humans and animals should be considered in any scientific experimentation.