请用学术专业英语和语法修饰和润色这段话Recently a particularly appealing system has been proposed to replace OER with electrooxidation of biomass and its derivatives such as alcohols glycerin and 5-hydroxymethylfural glu

Recently, a promising alternative to the traditional oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has emerged, involving the electrooxidation of biomass and its derivatives, such as alcohols, glycerin, 5-hydroxymethylfural, and glucose. This approach exhibits a sustainable nature and does not disrupt the current carbon balance of our ecosystem (11-13). Furthermore, the electrooxidation of these compounds produces upgraded oxidative species, resulting in a theoretical potential lower than that of OER (14-18). As a result, water electrolysis coupled with these anodic reactions not only conserves electricity consumption, but also accelerates hydrogen production and generates high-value by-products, in contrast to the low-valued O2 produced in the OER process. However, the current electrooxidation reactions, such as those involving alcohols and aldehydes, typically require potentials greater than 1.23 V and operate at current densities lower than 200 mA/cm2 (19-21). Consequently, the electrooxidation of biomass is often accompanied by a competitive OER process that triggers H2/O2 gas-induced safety risks and leads to low efficiency and high energy consumption of hydrogen production. This limitation can be attributed to the high overpotentials in biomass electrooxidation processes, which involve high-energy carbon-hydrogen (C-H) and oxyhydrogen bond (O-H) breaking (Fig. 1). The slow kinetics and high energy barrier result in large working potentials, necessitating high energy input to overcome.