帮我改写下面这段话。资本逻辑与技术理性的共 谋开启了风险由自然转向社会 的篇章风险社会发轫于现代性 工业社会似乎已是一个不争的 事实。相较于前工业社会现代 性的风险跨出了地域或特定的 团体呈现出全球化的趋势。令 人担忧的是现代社会中的风险 制造者不惜以风险承担者为代价来维护自身的利益风险社会 中充斥着组织化的搪塞和诓骗 人类逐渐被社会化的风险笼罩 在黑暗之中。 风险作为工业社会的产物 与社会发展如

The collaboration between capital logic and technological rationality has opened a new chapter in which risks have shifted from being natural to social. The emergence of the risk society in modern industrial society is an undeniable fact. Compared to pre-industrial society, modern risks now extend beyond geographical or specific groups and exhibit a trend of globalization. What is worrying is that risk makers in modern society are willing to sacrifice risk bearers to maintain their own interests, and the risk society is rife with organized evasion and deception, gradually enveloping humanity in darkness.

As a product of industrial society, risk is intertwined with social development, wealth accumulation, resource distribution, technological use, and risk generation, impact, and threats. This intertwining is reflected in two aspects: the objective reduction of real material needs to the point of detachment from society, and the exponential growth of productivity that has released potential risks to an unprecedented degree. In the advanced stage of material wealth development, the forms of risk often exceed human perception and range, and systematic risk threats, whether overt or covert, large or small, are hidden in people's lives. Therefore, predicting and defining risk becomes crucial. However, in an imperfect evaluation system, prediction and definition can only rely on causal chain risk explanations and organization definitions that hold absolute political advantages.

The process of forming the risk society involves an "inequality" and an "equality." "Inequality" is explained by the development logic of capitalism. Its insatiable and endless nature makes the "representatives" of capitalism see the global spread of risk as a "big business" and attempt to gain economic or political benefits in the risk-making process through various means. There seems to be a class struggle in risk creation, where the winners enjoy the benefits while the losers are impoverished. As Matthew in the New Testament says, "For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them." "Equality" refers to the shared risk threat faced by all humanity due to the globalization of risk distribution. Although risk makers may benefit from risks for a period of time, this class struggle is temporary in the face of risk impact. Ecological threats or radioactive material threats do not selectively implement their effects; they ignore borders and classes. The "boomerang" of risk threats breaks down class benefits and "maintains" threat equality